About The American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment
The American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment (ACUPCC) is a high-visibility effort undertaken by a network of colleges and universities to address global climate disruption and accelerate progress towards climate neutrality and sustainability. Each institution has committed to eliminate net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from specified campus operations and to promote research and education geared towards stabilizing the earth’s climate.
ACUPCC was first created in October 2006 at Arizona State University with 12 college and university presidents as founding members. Today, over 675 universities and colleges in all 50 states and the District of Columbia are signatories under the ACUPCC, representing a student population of over 5.6 million.
The ACUPCC provides a framework and support for America’s colleges and universities to implement comprehensive plans in pursuit of climate neutrality. The commitment recognizes the unique responsibility that institutions of higher education have as role models within their communities and in providing education to accelerate climate neutrality and reverse global warming. In addition, implementing efficiency measures in educational facilities typically reduces long-term energy expenses, optimizes energy use and provides predictability for energy costs and budgeting.
As signatories of the ACUPCC, institutions have agreed to:
- Complete an emissions inventory.
- Within two years, set a target date and interim milestones for becoming climate neutral.
- Take immediate steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by choosing from a list of short-term actions (typically derived from an energy audit).
- Integrate sustainability into the curriculum and make it part of the educational experience.
- Make the action plan, inventory and progress reports publicly available.
Understanding your emissions trajectory
As a critical component of the ACUPCC, signatories are required to develop a comprehensive inventory of all GHG emissions within one year after signing the commitment and an updated GHG emission report every other year thereafter. Collecting your unique GHG emissions data can be daunting; however, understanding your emissions trajectory over time will provide a starting point for identifying potential energy conservation measures (ECMs) and developing a comprehensive climate action plan to achieve climate neutrality. Consistent with the GHG Protocol standards, ACUPCC signatories are required to report on three scopes of emissions sources, including Scopes 1 and 2, and two areas of Scope 3.
Scope 1: Direct Emissions
Scope 1 emissions are those that are physically produced on campus (e.g. on-campus power production, campus vehicle fleets, refrigerant leaks). These sources are “owned or directly controlled” by your institution.
Scope 2: Indirect Emissions
Scope 2 emissions are mostly associated with purchased utilities required for campus operation. They are indirect emissions resulting from activities that take place within the organizational boundaries of the institution, but that occur at sources owned or controlled by another entity.
Scope 3: Other Indirect Emissions
Scope 3 includes emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the campus, but that are central to campus operations or activities (e.g. non-fleet transportation, employee/student commuting, air travel paid for by your institution).
Greenhouse gas emissions inventory process
There are three stages to the GHG emissions inventory process: data collection; GHG emissions calculation; and data analysis for climate action planning. The raw data required for a campus GHG inventory calculation falls generally under the following major categories:
- Purchased electricity, steam and chilled water
- On campus stationary sources (energy generation)
- Transportation (commuting, air travel, campus fleet)
- Agriculture (fertilizer use, animal waste)
- Solid waste (incinerated, landfill)
- Refrigerants and other chemicals
- Offsets (Renewable Energy Credits purchased, composting, forest preservation, local offset project such as paying for boiler conversion at a local K-12 school, etc.)
This data may be acquired from a variety of sources, including: campus metering, energy management and data management systems, the physical plant department, the campus planning office, local utilities, etc. Following data collection, GHG emissions can be calculated from the raw data. Although there are free calculator tools available, institutions are often better served by hiring an independent energy consultant to facilitate and conduct the data collection, energy audits, emission calculations, reporting and resulting data analysis. Following the development of a comprehensive emissions inventory, a Climate Action Plan (CAP) should be developed to include strategies on reducing GHG emissions and achieving climate neutrality.
Stay tuned for Part II of this series to learn more about the ACUPCC and how to develop and implement a climate action plan to meet your emission reduction targets and sustainability goals!
For municipalities or industrial entities operating utilities, the growing need for energy reliability and leveraging central control of remote electric and/or mechanical equipment has led to a rise in Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition systems, or SCADA systems. These systems can monitor and alter utility and equipment performance across an entire infrastructure from one central location. However, out-of-date software, virus susceptibility and grid placement can create gaps in SCADA systems, leaving a utility vulnerable to cyber-attack or failure. Due to these severe consequences facing vulnerable utilities, selecting the proper SCADA system software provider is crucial to continued performance and safety. Expert energy consultants can help select the best provider, while also acting as a client agent throughout the Request for Proposal (RFP) and implementation processes, bringing best practice knowledge to the project and helping make educated choices about system execution.
When the Vineland Municipal Electric Utility (VMEU) required upgrades to its existing SCADA system, the municipally owned utility initiated a comprehensive bidding process for a qualified owner’s representative to manage the design and implementation. VMEU wanted to do all it could to proactively mitigate any potential security risks, while also ensuring continued power reliability for its customers in Vineland, New Jersey. Following a competitive bidding process, VMEU hired SourceOne, a national energy management firm, to serve as owner’s representative for the implementation of a state-of-the-art, multi-platform, open network architecture based SCADA system.
How do SCADA systems work?
Generally, SCADA systems use Remote Telemetry Units (RTUs) to monitor physical points, or substations, within an electric grid or comparable utility. These RTUs transmit data back to one central location, the master station, in order to monitor fluctuations in activity, emergency events and equipment failures. In addition to being able to see what is happening throughout the grid in near real-time, SCADA enables the operator at the central location to control alarm response, turn equipment on or off, close or open valves, reset fuses, signal backup equipment to takeover or other actions and efficiently allocate resources across the substations during an emergency event.
Using coded signals to provide control of remote equipment, Data Acquisition Systems gather information from meters and equipment and relay their operating status’ and performance history to the master station. Human Machine Interfaces (HMIs) process the data retrieved from RTUs and present it to the operator understandably, with the help of animations, schematics and graphs, to represent the current state of operating machinery. Diagnostic statistics can be conveyed as well to help a utility understand its performance and plan for any future failures. All of this data at hand results in more informed decision making regarding energy assets and the subsequent improved management of electrical infrastructure altogether.
Security risk mitigation for web-based SCADA systems
New innovations in technology have led to the development of cloud based SCADA systems, which can reduce infrastructure costs but leave a utility even more vulnerable to cyber-attacks than previous installations. In the event of a cyber-attack, a virus or hacker could alter the transmitted data, making performance appear normal and preventing any alarms even in the case of a system failure, regional power outage or surge. In the event of an electric grid failure or targeted power outage, hospitals could become inoperable, traffic lights could go out, water and wastewater utilities may not be able to treat water and a municipality would be left dealing with these and various other threats to the health and safety of its community.
In order to prevent disaster, SCADA systems and the experts who implement them must develop multiple layers of industrial-grade firewalls to keep attackers out and electric grids running. Complicating matters, many municipalities, including Vineland, operate on grids provided by other cities which require additional data transfer and therefore, permeation of certain firewalls. To account for these circumstances, cities and businesses can mitigate their risk by seeking help from energy consulting experts well-versed in SCADA systems and system security to select the best suited software. The SCADA software provider itself is responsible for all maintenance, upgrades, security threat mitigation and, in the case of company closure, stored data retrieval. This is even more reason to carefully select the right owner’s representative and SCADA system provider. Utilities may also want to question how controllers can access and respond to remote data alerts, as wireless systems and mobile devices can provide both an additional alert system and another point of attack.
Advanced SCADA systems provide redundancy and scalability
Part of a well-implemented SCADA system’s role is to ensure continued system reliability and performance, even in the event of an equipment failure. Selecting a system with built-in redundancy can help improve reliability at all times, but is particularly helpful during weather emergencies. Failing parts can be identified immediately, and their responsibilities taken over by remotely triggered backup equipment. This prevents an employee from driving to the substation during a severe weather event and offers a quicker response to the homes and businesses that depend on the substation in question. Perhaps even more appealing, advanced SCADA systems offer an electric utility more opportunity to upgrade and expand its system due to the technical flexibility and ability to add additional monitoring points and substations easily. Centrally managing these sites, and those that incorporate newer, renewable energy sources like wind and solar power, allow utilities like VMEU to deliver more sustainable and reliable power.
Selecting a qualified owner’s representative will ensure the implementation of the most effective SCADA solution to deliver power reliability and redundancy, while mitigating potential security risks. With an upgraded SCADA system in place, municipalities and industrial businesses will be better equipped to handle day-to-day operational threats and those threats posed by extreme circumstances. Scheduled to be completed by the end of 2014, Vineland Municipal Electric Utility’s SCADA project serves as a model example of a utility taking the necessary steps to better monitor, protect and control its power generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure, while delivering efficient and reliable power to customers.
NYMEX Natural Gas Futures Market
Mostly driven by heavy winter withdrawals and the exit from winter with inventories at a 10 year low, forward strips for 2015 have moved upwards since the six month low on January 10th at $3.995/MMBtu. Forwards for 2015 have softened in reaction to several strong storage reports over the past few weeks but there is still a premium on these forwards compared with this time last year. The June 14 contract gained about 11 cents to settle at $4.619/MMBtu in the last day of trading this week as open positions were closed. Monthly contracts for the balance of 2014 have followed a similar trajectory as the 2015 annual strip with some backing off of current trading values with an average balance of the year strip at $4.54/MMBtu and a six month high to low spread of about 87 cents. Future support and resistance levels for the remaining contracts in 2014 will be determined by both the actual level of gas demand created by summer cooling requirements and continued increased supply that has been created by current pricing.....
Click the link below to download the entire June energy commodity market update!
(If you missed the Part II blog post in this series about ESPCs and ESCOs, CLICK HERE!)
Why You Should Hire An Independent ESCO Owner’s Representative
Organizations should consider hiring an independent owner’s representative to manage an Energy Services Company (ESCO) when implementing an Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) or an Energy Services Agreement (ESA), particularly when implementing complex, multi-year, energy conservation projects. Acting as owner’s representative, an independent energy consulting firm will objectively evaluate the ESCO’s Investment Grade Audit (IGA), validate the projected energy savings and costs, and oversee the implementation and ongoing Measurement and Verification (M&V) of the proposed energy conservation measures (ECMs).
Because the IGA serves as a blueprint for the project, any errors or miscalculations within this document can significantly impact the project’s financial and economic viability. In addition, an independent energy consulting firm will be able to guide the process and act on the owner’s behalf, particularly for projects complicated or broad in scope. Hiring an owner’s representative has proven to be particularly advantageous for the one of the largest cities in Massachusetts, in supporting its multi-year, city-wide energy management initiative to implement several energy efficiency and renewable energy projects.
(Learn more about ESCOs, ESPCs, ESAs, and IGAs within Part I and Part II of this blog series!)
One of the Largest Cities in Massachusetts Launches a City-Wide Energy Management Initiative
Nestled within a harbor along the south coast region of Massachusetts, one of the largest cities in the Commonwealth sought a cost effective and efficient strategy to reduce their attributable carbon footprint, operating costs, and energy costs associated with city-owned facilities and infrastructure. By leveraging SourceOne as owner’s representative, the city selected an ESCO firm and is negotiating a performance-based, multi-year Energy Management Services Project (EMSP), incorporating guaranteed energy savings, energy efficiency and cost savings projects at 40+ sites.
During the next phase of the project, SourceOne will continue to represent the city, including reviewing the ESCO’s Investment Grade Audits for the selected facilities, overseeing implementation of ECMs, verifying commissioning of newly installed equipment, and ensuring the accuracy of M&V analysis post-implementation. Specific projects include fuel conversion from oil to natural gas at several buildings, streetlight upgrades to LED technology and other renewable energy technologies. The efficiency projects, when completed, will improve the City’s habitability, infrastructure, and reduce operating and maintenance costs.
Maximize ROI for Capital Projects with an ESCO Owner’s Representative
Businesses, organizations, and municipalities should engage an independent ESCO owner’s representative to advance multiple energy conservation and capital improvement projects. An energy management expert will confirm and validate the baseline energy use, economic analysis, proposed project scope and costs, and guaranteed savings for the project, in addition to facilitating implementation and verification of ongoing M&V. Engaging an independent energy consulting firm, skilled in energy master planning, engineering, and ESCO procurement, enables streamlined and cost-effective implementation for complex, multi-year energy conservation projects, while ensuring that energy efficiency, water conservation, and emissions reduction goals are met.
Please Subscribe to our blog to receive our posts directly!
(If you missed the Part I blog post in this series about ESPCs, CLICK HERE!)
An Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) is arranged between an organization and a private partner/contractor, often called an Energy Services Company (ESCO), that will manage the project and provide a solid guarantee on savings. ESPC’s enable organizations to implement a wide range of ECMs, including building envelope measures, building automation and energy management systems, energy and utility distribution systems, and advanced metering systems. Other ESPC financial benefits can also include savings from scaled-down operations and maintenance (O&M) costs, as well as utility and tax incentives. (Learn more about ESPCs and why organizations and businesses use them within Part I of this ESPC blog series!).
ESPCs - Breaking Down the Basics
Following the completion of a comprehensive energy audit to identify energy saving opportunities, the selected ESCO will develop an Investment Grade Audit (IGA), incorporating an advanced design, estimated project costs, and a savings guarantee. An IGA provides a thorough breakdown of potential energy conservation measures at a facility, everything from operation and maintenance recommendations to suggestions for major renovation. The IGA also incorporates a savings guarantee and is used as a mechanism to procure financing.
Once a guaranteed savings contract is executed, the next phase of the ESPC is implementation. The ESCO acts as the general contractor for the energy improvement project, taking full ownership of the whole process. This ensures that the project is executed with the same integrity as the analysis and also ensures single-source accountability from the development phase to the guarantee phase. The ESCO manages the installation of equipment and related ECMs. The ESCO is also responsible for performing annual Measurement and Verification (M&V) to ensure that the guaranteed savings are realized over the life of the contract. Under an ESPC, the energy savings are projected to match or exceed the costs of the retrofit.
The ESPC model is a very effective mechanism that can be leveraged by organizations and businesses to provide budget flexibility and innovative funding solutions for capital projects. Although organizations can leverage various contract models to advance energy conservation projects, including an Energy Services Agreement (ESA).
Energy Services Agreements and Why You Should Avoid Them
An Energy Services Agreement (ESA) is a contract established between a business/organization and an ESCO, where the ESCO incurs the financial risk, for a share of the resulting savings. The organization pays the ESCO over time as energy savings are realized. Although the organization may initially benefit by avoiding immediate risk and short-term budgetary constraint, ESA’s may not be as favorable in the long term for the following reasons:
- An ESA requires a private partner committed to investing capital. Providing enough incentive for the private partner’s investment can result in an agreement that may not be as favorable in the long term as some other options.
- ESA’s also face strict M&V requirements, as well as tight legal parameters to work within.
- Organization are obligated to pay the ESCO a share of the savings resulting from the energy efficiency improvements during the term of the contract, which can extend up to 25 years.
- Finally, ESA’s require businesses and organizations to make a long-term commitment to an energy partner.
Leverage ESPCs to Advance Infrastructure Projects
Organizations and businesses are often better served by procuring independent 3rdparty financing and leveraging an ESPC. Rather than share the resulting savings over the term of the contract with the ESCO, the organization absorbs the investment risk and reaps 100% of the savings throughout the life of the contract. An ESPC agreement limits long-term contract obligations and allows organizations to maintain control over their investment and assets. In addition, an independent energy consulting firm will design and select the best solution possible, rather than specifying and supplying its own equipment; which is a common practice of ESCO providers that also manufacture equipment. The ESPC model proved to be critical in advancing a boiler decentralization project for the Dimock Center, a non-profit health center located in Roxbury, Mass.
SourceOne Helps the Dimock Center Achieve $150,000 in Annual Guaranteed Savings Via An ESPC
Following an energy audit of the Dimock Center campus, SourceOne, a national energy consulting firm, identified the existing 1930’s central heating plant as a key energy conservation measure (ECM) and recommended its replacement. The projected energy savings and efficiencies presented by SourceOne persuaded the Dimock Center to replace its central plant; although, as a non-profit, the Dimock Center was unable to independently fund the project. In order to secure capital, SourceOne presented the ESPC model as a mechanism to finance and advance the project.
Public-sector entities, like the Dimock Center, are well-suited to take advantage of ESPC partnerships. Capital bonds and tax-exempt loans can be leveraged to enhance the ultimate financial outcome. Spreading a project’s cost out over time lessens the impact on budgets and ultimately allows the project to pay for itself as savings are realized.
Following the Dimock Center’s success in securing financing, SourceOne managed the ESPC, including the design and construction to replace the existing oil-fired steam plant with natural gas fired point-of-use boilers. The IGA, developed by SourceOne, identified an annual $150,000 guarantee on savings, and was an integral document enabling the Dimock Center to obtain 3rd-party financing.
Completed in October 2013, SourceOne successfully managed the design and construction for this boiler decentralization project, achieving a 30% reduction of capital costs, in addition to reducing the schedule by a year. By procuring independent financing, the Dimock Center will accrue 100% of the annual $150,000 guarantee on savings. Additional savings realized during the project implementation were also passed on to Dimock Center. This turn-key solution, completed a year ahead of schedule and significantly under budget, will generate significant savings, greater energy efficiencies, and improved occupant comfort for the non-profit for years to come.
ESPCs Deliver a Solid Return on Investment
The guaranteed savings, positive cash flow, and projected Return on Investment (ROI) offered by an ESPC provide public entities and businesses the ability to argue in favor of investment. Coupled with the flexibility of the financing options, ESPC’s provide a strong case for implementation.
CLICK HERE to read Part III of this series to learn why you should engage an owner’s representative if you are considering hiring an ESCO.
If you missed the ESPC Part I blog post in this series, CLICK HERE!
And be sure to Subscribe to our blog to receive our posts directly!
Implement Infrastructure Projects With Energy Savings Performance Contracts
These days, many businesses and organizations are reevaluating capital budgets and pinching pennies wherever possible to meet infrastructure needs, while still trying to grow their core business. Aging infrastructure, significant up-front capital cost requirements, and rising energy costs and volatility, represent significant challenges for businesses and organizations that are often unable to fund critical infrastructure improvements. Fortunately, there are financing options available to advance these projects, such as Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPC). An ESPC is an agreement between an organization and a contractor, often called an Energy Services Company (ESCO), who will design and manage a project to reduce energy and maintenance costs at a facility and provide guarantee on the resulting savings.
Finance Energy Efficiency Projects Via Future Estimated Savings
Through an ESPC contract, organizations can essentially finance the cost of the project from the future estimated savings resulting from the capital improvements. The ESPC model can be leveraged by organizations and businesses to advance complex and expensive capital infrastructure projects. By integrating energy conservation measures (ECMs) into consolidation plans, ESPCs can be used to execute projects of all sizes for commercial properties in any industry.
Facility improvements can constitute a wide range of energy efficiency enhancements, including the installation of new lighting, energy-efficient windows, automated controls, energy management systems, new high efficiency boilers, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) upgrades, insulation improvements, water conservation upgrades or solar panel installations.
Why Organizations and Businesses Use ESPCs
Through an ESPC, facilities can achieve consolidation and energy efficiency incentives that may have previously been out of reach due to upfront fiscal restrictions. There are several motivating factors driving the adoption of Energy Savings Performance Contracts, including:
- Lack of capital to advance facility improvements within existing budgets.
- Guaranteed performance; Ensures accountability for
- Budget control through reduced utility, service and operating expenditures.
- Life-cycle cost solutions and technology improvements.
- The ability leverage a wide array of supporting services from external vendors for energy related infrastructure needs.
- Processes improvements.
- Enhanced occupant experience and productivity.
- Supports energy efficiency and environmental conservation goals.
- Building system-wide efficiency improvements and modernization.
- Capital avoidance resulting from incorporating capital costs into energy projects that generate Return on Investment (ROI) and/or positive cash flow.
Qualified projects and organizations should be looking at ESPCs as a best practice for optimizing their facilities. Although there are different contract models used to implement energy conservation projects and organizations should consider and weigh each option carefully.
CLICK HERE to read Part II of this post to learn more about ESPCs and various contract models used to implement capital improvement projects.
In light of today's complex business and energy environment, complicated lease language, and complex allocation models, managing utility costs and energy consumption can be difficult, time consuming, and costly. However, by implementing a web-based energy management system, tied to a robust metering system, organizations can achieve significant cost and energy savings. These systems allow you to track and quantify energy use, streamline meter data collection, and accelerate cost recovery, while providing customized energy tenant invoicing and reporting options....
Click on the link below to read the January 2014 New England Real Estate Journal article! Chris Barros, PE, SourceOne's Vice President and the General Manager of Energy Management, highlights the benefits of metering and web-based energy management systems in reducing energy use and generating cost savings for commercial buildings.
Learn how demand control ventilation can reduce energy use
Can ventilation requirements and energy conservation go hand in hand? They can if you implement demand control ventilation (DCV).
There’s no reason to waste energy conditioning air for people who aren’t in your building. Instead of supplying air at fixed rates, DCV automatically adjusts ventilation levels based on real-time occupancy measurements. This strategy allows you to meet code and reduce energy use without sacrificing indoor air quality.....
Click on the link below to read the Buildings Magazine article! Jules Nohra, SourceOne's Manager of Energy Efficiency, was quoted in the article and highlights the benefits of DCV in reducing energy use, improving indoor air quality, and generating cost savings.
Avoid Schedule Delays and Spiraling Construction Costs
Coordinating utility power requirements for a large-scale construction project can be time-consuming and costly for real estate investment trusts (REITs), land developers, and construction firms. Projects that involve utility infrastructure modifications, including new service requests, existing service upgrades, temporary power requests, or infrastructure relocation, require coordination with the local utility. Hurdles navigating investor-owned utility companies can lead to significant cost and schedule overruns. However, initiating planning early in the project lifecycle, involving key stakeholders and utility experts, and establishing a single point of accountability, can greatly reduce schedule delays and unnecessary costs.
The “Black Box” – Hurdles Navigating the Utility
Unexpected changes or project requirements that arise further along into design and construction can have a significant impact on schedule and cost. This is particularly true for utility infrastructure requirements for large-scale construction projects. Challenges procuring temporary or permanent power from the utility can have significant cost and schedule implications.
Utilities have undergone significant restructuring and cost-cutting in recent years, resulting in utility workers that are stretched too thin and frequent changes to policies and procedures. Investor-owned utilities have their own unique engineering and construction policies and procedures, which are often not well understood outside of the utility by project stakeholders. These challenges have created a “black box” within the utilities, while developers and construction firms struggle to understand and navigate its internal workings.
Because project stakeholders may not have the relationships at the utility to streamline utility power requirements, REITs and commercial developers often run into hurdles in procuring utility power for their construction projects. Delays in obtaining temporary or permanent utility power can lead to significant schedule delays and unforeseen construction costs, such as on-site diesel-fueled generators.
Utility Power Delays and On-site Generators Can Spiral Project Costs
Cost Avoidance is critical for any construction project. The cost for an on-site generator, depending on the size and fuel consumed, can have a huge impact on overall project costs and schedule. For example, a typical 500kW diesel generator will incur approximately $45,000/month (est.) in rental fees, maintenance, delivery charges, operator costs, and fuel consumed. Whereas, if temporary power is coordinated through the utility prior to construction, these additional costs are avoided, resulting in significant savings. Therefore, it’s critical to engage an expert that is familiar with utility processes and procedures, gas infrastructure, and medium to high-voltage electrical applications.
Specialized Experts in Utility Management – SourceOne Unlocks the ”Black Box”
With decades of medium and high-voltage power systems expertise and years of natural gas construction experience working directly for investor-owned utilities (such as NSTAR and National Grid), SourceOne can take the headache and expense out of utility coordination.
SourceOne provides turnkey utility management services, scalable to the project size, scope, and requirements, including electrical and gas infrastructure due diligence, power master planning, and utility power coordination. SourceOne is providing utility power coordination on several notable, multi-million dollar development projects across New England, including the Chestnut Hill Mall development in Chestnut Hill, MA, the Pier 4 Mixed Use Development in Boston, and LoveJoy Wharf, Converse’s new world headquarters in Boston.
Because of this direct utility experience and expertise in power systems, SourceOne experts are able to unlock the “black box” to successfully navigate and coordinate with the utility. This includes proposing alternative designs to the utility, providing checks and balances to the design process, and scrutinizing designs, work orders, and estimates to make sure the customer is getting exactly what they are paying for. In addition, SourceOne actively looks for parts of the design that may be considered system improvement and subsequently non-billable to the customer. With SourceOne at the helm, scheduling is more likely to stay on track, and any gaps in the division of work are quickly identified and filled. By leveraging utility relationships and using a “boots on the ground” approach, SourceOne acts as an intermediary between the utility and key stakeholders to actively manage power needs through to project completion.
REITs, land developers, and construction firms should engage a qualified utility expert to manage utility requirements, from inception to energization. With proper planning and the right experts in place, both unnecessary costs and schedule delays can be avoided.
About the 2013 City Energy Efficiency Scorecard
On September 17, 2013, the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) released a new report titled 2013 City Energy Efficiency Scorecard. ACEEE’s new report ranks America’s 34 largest cities on their efforts to save energy and costs in five key areas. These categories cover local government operations, community-wide initiatives, buildings policies, energy and water utilities, and public benefits programs and transportation policies.
Boston Scores High In Five Key Areas
With its Renew Boston initiative, strict building energy codes, new energy benchmarking ordinance, transportation and other community-wide programs, it is no surprise that Boston was ranked the most energy-efficient US city, scoring 76.75 points out of a possible 100. Portland, Oregon, New York City, San Francisco, Seattle and Austin came in just behind Boston.
Here is a look at Boston’s scores in five key areas:
- Local Government Operations: 11/15
- Community-wide Initiatives: 9.5/10
- Buildings Policies: 21.5/29
- Energy and Water Utilities and Public Benefits Programs: 15.75/18
- Transportation Policies: 19/28
Energy Audits Quantify Energy Use and Drive Efficiencies
Energy efficiency encompasses a wide range of cost-saving energy conservation and planning initiatives to minimize energy usage, maximize savings and reduce carbon footprint. In order to address inefficiencies, energy usage must first be quantified. This is often accomplished via an energy audit by a trained engineer. The objective of an energy audit is first to quantify and analyze usage and then to identify applicable Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) to increase energy efficiency and reduce Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. Energy audits typically adhere to the parameters established by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Procedures for Commercial Building Energy Audits and, depending on the level, encompass varying degrees of detail (historical energy data, existing conditions assessment, projected energy savings, project cost estimate, payback period, etc.).
Energy Conservation Measures – The Path to Savings and Sustainability
Energy Conservation Measures can incorporate a wide range of infrastructure and operational improvements, including; recommendations for building envelope (replacing windows, installing insulation, controlling air leakage, etc.), heating and cooling and improvements (building automation controls, heat pumps, installing thermostats, etc.), lighting improvements, implementing efficient and/or renewable energy technologies (solar power, wind power, geothermal, etc.), and adjusting building operations.
As a national energy management consulting firm, SourceOne has helped several public agencies and private companies on a wide range of energy efficiency initiatives to achieve significant economic and environmental benefits. Relevant examples include the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA), the City of New Bedford, and the Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance (DCAMM), to name a few. The MWRA, for example, has benefitted greatly from the implementation of a 1.2 MW Back-Pressure Steam Turbine Generator at its Boston Harbor Deer Island Waste Water Treatment Plant. As the Owner’s Representative, SourceOne managed the project from conceptual design to construction. Since completion of the upgrades in 2011, the plant is offsetting approximately $550,000 in annual energy costs and avoids the release of 3,591 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions.
Energy Efficiency Supports Local Economic and Community Development
The clean energy industry continues to thrive in Boston and Massachusetts, benefiting the environment, economy and local communities. The executive summary of the 2013 City Energy Efficiency Scorecard report highlights the underutilized value of energy efficiency in improving and addressing a myriad of economic, environmental, infrastructure, and health concerns:
“Energy efficiency may be the cheapest, most abundant, and most underutilized resource for local economic and community development. Considerable evidence documents that investments in energy efficiency can improve community self-reliance and resilience, save money for households, businesses, anchor institutions, and local governments; create local jobs; extend the life of and reduce the costs and risks of critical infrastructure investments; catalyze local economic reinvestment; improve the livability and local asset value of the built environment; and protect human health and the natural environment through reducing emissions of criteria pollutants and greenhouse gases.”
After reading the opening statement of the report you begin to ask yourself “Why wouldn’t cities want to invest in energy efficiency?” Saving money, creating jobs, and improving community self-reliance are powerful incentives driving energy efficiency.
What’s Next for Energy Efficiency?
While many improvements have been made in recent years by cities and towns, energy efficiency is still an underutilized resource. Every town and city in the US should leverage and implement energy reduction opportunities to both achieve energy savings and meet environmental goals. The 2013 City Energy Efficiency Scorecard serves as an important tool highlighting best practices and encouraging and inspiring cities to become more energy efficient.